The Sovereignty and Kinship Challenge: Addressing Indonesia-Timor Leste Border Security in the Post-Conflict Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v19i3.690Keywords:
post-conflict borders, border typology, social capital, institutional coordination, Indonesia-Timor Leste, transnational crimeAbstract
Border security in post-conflict regions faces fundamental paradoxes between state sovereignty and socio-cultural realities. This study examines the Indonesia-Timor Leste border security in Belu Regency through the qualitative method using a case study design. The data were obtained from literature reviews, interviews with 11 key informants from security institutions, and secondary sources that are relevant to the study. Findings reveal three simultaneous border typologies—antecedent, subsequent, and superimposed boundaries—creating structural complexities beyond technical solutions. Kinship networks function as double-edged swords: they provide social capital for reconciliation, yet vulnerabilities are exploited for transnational crime when security policies overlook the social legitimacy of these networks. Institutional coordination remains reactive-informal, relying on personal relationships rather than systematic integration. The study extends Portes' social capital theory by demonstrating how state policies themselves transform social capital into security liabilities. Three practical recommendations emerge: reactivating biometric-based Border Crossing Permits with guaranteed accessibility, developing integrated Border Management Systems connecting six agencies, and institutionalizing community-based border management. Comparative lessons from Indonesia-Malaysia borders confirm that effective security requires balancing territorial sovereignty with legitimate community needs through formal coordination platforms and soft border approaches.Downloads
References
Ackleson, J. (2005). Constructing security on the US-Mexico border. Political Geography, 24(2), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.09.017
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(1), 63-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105
Bilgic, A., & Pace, M. (2017). The European Union as a human security actor in the borderlands: The case of Turkey. Geopolitics, 22(3), 664-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1275371
Brambilla, C. (2015). Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics, 20(1), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561
Caparini, M. (2006). Civil society and the future of civil-military relations in post-conflict countries. In A. Bryden & H. Hänggi (Eds.), Security governance in post-conflict peacebuilding (pp. 235-258). LIT Verlag.
Chalfin, B. (2010). Neoliberal frontiers: An ethnography of sovereignty in West Africa. University of Chicago Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Cons, J. (2016). Sensitive space: Fragmented territory at the India-Bangladesh border. University of Washington Press.
Côté-Boucher, K., Infantino, F., & Salter, M. B. (2014). Border security as practice: An agenda for research. Security Dialogue, 45(3), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614533243
Dijstelbloem, H., & Meijer, A. (Eds.). (2011). Migration and the new technological borders of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dupont, B., Grabosky, P., & Shearing, C. (2003). The governance of security in weak and failing states. Criminal Justice, 3(4), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802503003004001
European Commission. (2023). Communication on the Multiannual Strategic Policy for European Integrated Border Management (COM(2023) 146 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2023). Communication on the multiannual strategic policy for European integrated border management (COM(2023) 146 final). https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/
Firdaus, A. Y., & Umar, H. (2022). Indonesia-Malaysia border conflict. Journal of Government and Politics, 13(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.v13i2.14567
Gaub, F. (2017). Border management in an era of 'statebuilding lite': Security assistance and Lebanon's hybrid sovereignty. International Affairs, 93(4), 865-882. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix135
Goldsmith, A. (2005). Police reform and the problem of trust. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 443-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480605057727
Guiraudon, V., & Lahav, G. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: The case of migration control. Comparative Political Studies, 33(2), 163-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033002001
Gunawan, B., Nurisnaeny, P. S., Kaprisma, H., & Ratmono, B. M. (2024). Border Security in Intelligence Perspective: A Bibliometric Analysis (1985-2022). In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Border Region (INTSOB 2023) (pp. 28-38). (Proceedings of the International Seminar on Border Region (INTSOB 2023); Vol. 823). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-208-8_6
Günay, C., & Witjes, N. (Eds.). (2016). Border politics: Defining spaces of governance and forms of transgressions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46855-6
Hartshorne, R. (1951). The Nature of Geography (4th Printing). Pennsylvania: The Science Press Printing Company.
Hartshorne, R. (1951). The nature of geography (4th printing). The Science Press Printing Company.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2024). Integrated Border Management. Geneva: IOM.
Johnson, C., & Jones, R. (Eds.). (2019). Placing the border in everyday life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315595696
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Kase, P., Tamunu, M. L., Oiladang, C. E., & Tadeus, D. W. (2018). The influence of government policy on the management of border conflict between Indonesia and the Oecusse District, Timor Leste. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4.38), 932-938.
Kasparek, B. (2016). Routes, corridors, and spaces of exception: Governing migration and Europe. Near Futures Online, 1. http://nearfuturesonline.org/routes-corridors-and-spaces-of-exception-governing-migration-and-europe/
Kolossov, V., & Scott, J. (2013). Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgeo, 1. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.10532
Lee, T. H., & Tham, S. Y. (2022). Cross-border governance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and adaptation in the integration of the Tebedu-Entikong border region. Journal of International Studies, 18, 89-123. https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2022.18.4
Longo, M. (2018). The politics of borders: Sovereignty, security, and the citizen after 9/11. Cambridge University Press.
Martinez, O. J. (1994). The dynamics of border interaction: New approaches to border analysis. In C. H. Schofield (Ed.), Global boundaries (pp. 1-15). Routledge.
Megoran, N. (2017). Nationalism in Central Asia: A biography of the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan boundary. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Müller-Crepon, C., Schvitz, G., & Cederman, L-E. (2025). Shaping states into nations: The effects of ethnic geography on state borders. American Journal of Political Science, 69(1), 132-147. DOI: 10.1111/ajps 12838
Müller-Crepon, C., Schvitz, G., & Cederman, L-E. (2025). Shaping states into nations: The effects of ethnic geography on state borders. American Journal of Political Science, 69(1), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12838
Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161. DOI: 10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
Nurisnaeny, P.S., Mubaroq, S. R., Kaprisma, H., Perdana, I. A., & Budiman, R. (2024). Developing an AI-enhanced maritime border security framework: A case study of Indonesia-Malaysia borders at Sebatik Island. Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 26(3), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v26i3.60820
O'Dowd, L. (2002). The changing significance of European borders. Regional & Federal Studies, 12(4), 13-36.
O'Dowd, L. (2004). The changing significance of European borders. In Anderson, J., O'Dowd, L., & Wilson, T. M. (Eds.), New Borders for a Changing Europe: Cross-Border Cooperation and Governance (pp. 13-36). London: Routledge.
O'Dowd, L. (2004). The changing significance of European borders. In J. Anderson, L. O'Dowd, & T. M. Wilson (Eds.), New borders for a changing Europe: Cross-border cooperation and governance (pp. 13-36). Routledge.
Paine, J., Qiu, X., & Ricart-Huguet, J. (2024). Endogenous colonial borders: Precolonial states and geography in the partition of Africa. American Political Science Review, 119(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055424000054
Paine, J., Qiu, X., & Ricart-Huguet, J. (2024). Endogenous colonial borders: Precolonial states and geography in the partition of Africa. American Political Science Review, 119(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424000054
Palmer, L., & Carvalho, D. (2021). Borderland identities: The politics of belonging along the Timor-Leste/Indonesia border. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 62(2), 185-199.
Palmer, L., & Carvalho, D. (2021). Borderland identities: The politics of belonging along the Timor-Leste/Indonesia border. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 62(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12293
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Raharjo, S. N. I., Pudjiastuti, T. N., & Nufus, H. (2024). Cross-border cooperation as a method of conflict management: A case study in the Sulu-Sulawesi Sea. Conflict, Security & Development, 24(3), 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2024.2355528
Raharjo, S., & Pristiyanto, D. (2021). Border management challenges in post-conflict regions: The case of Indonesia-Timor Leste. Asian Journal of Political Science, 29(3), 234-251.
Rosière, S., & Jones, R. (2012). Teichopolitics: Re-considering globalisation through the role of walls and fences. Geopolitics, 17(1), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.574653
Sadozaï, M. (2024). When international relations theory meets border studies: A transnationalist approach to the study of remote borderlands. International Studies Review, 26(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa114
Simarmata, R., Tahir, R., Bakri, S., Sholihah, N. A., Dhawiti, A., & Fadhillah, D. (2019). Kompleksitas Pengelolaan Perbatasan Indonesia-Timor Leste. Jakarta: PATTIRO & The Asia Foundation.
Syafe’I, M., Meutia, I.F., & Yulianti, D. (2020). Komunitas Keamanan Terpadu Berbasis Collaborative Governance. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 14 (3), 231-251. https://jurnalptik.id/JIK/article/view/281/101.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Thompson, D. K. (2024). Respatializing federalism in the Horn's borderlands: From contraband control to transnational governmentality. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 39(3), 295-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2022.2046789
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2023). Integrated Border Stability Mechanism Set to Strengthen Border Governance and Security in West African Countries. Abidjan: UNODC Regional Office for West and Central Africa.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). Integrated border stability mechanism set to strengthen border governance and security in West African countries. UNODC Regional Office for West and Central Africa.
United States Institute of Peace. (2024). Transnational crime in Southeast Asia: A growing threat to global peace and security. USIP Senior Study Group Final Report. https://www.usip.org/publications/2024/05/transnational-crime-southeast-asia
Van Schendel, W. (2005). Spaces of engagement: How borderlands, illicit flows, and territorial states interlock. In W. van Schendel & I. Abraham (Eds.), Illicit flows and criminal things: States, borders, and the other side of globalization (pp. 38-68). Indiana University Press.
Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015). Europe's border crisis: Biopolitical security and beyond. Oxford University Press.
Wong Villanueva, J. L., Kidokoro, T., & Seta, F. (2022). Cross-border integration, cooperation, and governance: A systems approach for evaluating "good" governance in cross-border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(5), 1047-1070. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2020.1855227
Wong Villanueva, J. L., Kidokoro, T., & Seta, F. (2022). Cross-border integration, cooperation, and governance: A systems approach for evaluating "good" governance in cross-border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(5), 1047-1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1855227
Yahya, Y., Widjayanto, J., & Hendra, A. (2024). National security threats in the Indonesian border areas with Timor Leste. Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 3(2), 209-218.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
