Policing in the Media Arena: Layered Accountability and Oversight in Reality Police Shows

Authors

  • Daniel Artasasta Tambunan Indonesian National Police Science College
  • Kadek Citra Dewi Suparwati Indonesian National Police Science College
  • Adrianus Eliasta Sembiring Meliala University of Indonesia
  • Supardi Hamid Indonesian National Police Science College
  • Ilham Prisgunanto University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v20i1.716

Keywords:

police accountability, mediated policing, layered accountability, police oversight, reality police shows

Abstract

This article examines how mediated visibility reconfigures police oversight and accountability in Indonesia by treating reality police shows as an empirical arena. This study uses a qualitative–analytical design integrating semi-structured interviews with key institutional actors (Indonesian National Police/POLRI, media practitioners, and broadcast regulators), observational analysis of televised police representations and the digital recirculation, and document analysis of relevant governance and communication frameworks. The findings show that formal oversight mechanisms within Polri and state-based supervisory arrangements tend to operate reactively and with temporal delay when faced with fast-moving, visually driven public scrutiny. In this gap, media platforms, through televised programs and fragmented online circulation, function as a dominant informal overseer that shapes public judgments through visibility management, framing, and affective resonance. These dynamics generate an asymmetrical layered accountability regime, in which symbolic accountability formed in the media arena frequently precedes and constrains the operation of formal accountability processes. The article further identifies a condition of dual accountability that produces a structural dilemma for the Public Relations Division of POLRI (Divhumas), which must uphold law-based procedural legitimacy while simultaneously responding to media-generated demands for symbolic legitimacy. Limited post-production evaluation, weak coordination across the production cycle, and crisis-oriented communication approaches shift meaning-making power toward media actors and audiences, increasing institutional vulnerability to representational distortion. The article contributes to Police Science by conceptualizing accountability as a cross-arena governance process and by outlining policy implications for strategic visibility management, preventive representational oversight, and early-warning monitoring of legitimacy risk under conditions of mediated policing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleem, Y., Waheed Khan, S., & Jamroze, S. (2021). Media’s Portrayal of Crime and Public Perception Toward the Criminal Justice System. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 10(4), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6413775

Bolin, G., & Jerslev, A. (2018). Surveillance through media, by media, in media. Northern Lights, 16(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.16.1.3_2

Bovens, M. (2006). Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability. A Conceptual Framework. European Governance Paper, (1). http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-06-01.pdf.

Bradford, B., Milani, J., & Jackson, J. (2017). Identity, legitimacy, and "making sense" of police use of force. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(3), 614–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0085

Brucato, B. (2015). The new transparency: Police violence in the context of ubiquitous surveillance. Media and Communication, 3(3), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i3.292

Colbran, M. P. (2020). Policing, social media, and the new media landscape: can the police and the traditional media ever successfully bypass each other? Policing and Society, 30(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1532426

Couldry, N. (2012). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Journal of Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019

Goldrosen, N. (2025). Police misconduct hearings as legitimacy dialogues. Policing and Society, 35(7), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2024.2442715

Goldsmith, A. J. (2010). Policing’s new visibility. British Journal of Criminology, 50(5), 914–934. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azq033

Graziano, L. M., & Gauthier, J. F. (2018). Media consumption and perceptions of police legitimacy. Policing, 41(5), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2016-0177

Mathiesen, T. (1997). The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ Revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480697001002003

Mauri-Rios, M., Ramon-Vegas, X., Rodríguez-Martínez, R., & Díaz-Campo, J. (2022). Indicators for evaluating media accountability. Cuadernos.Info, (51), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.51.27331

McKay, B. (2022). Mapping the Police-Media Institutional Relationship. MacEwan University Student EJournal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31542/muse.v6i1.22602260

McMillan, J. A., Smith, J. D., & Benet, W. J. (2023). Civilian Oversight of Police Through the Lens of Polarities of Democracy. Journal of Sustainable Social Change, 15(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.5590/JSSC.2023.15.1.04

Mohler, M., Campbell, C., Henderson, K., & Renauer, B. (2022). Policing in an era of sousveillance: a randomised controlled trial examining the influence of video footage on perceptions of legitimacy. Policing and Society, 32(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1878169

Morrow, S. (2019). Social & News Media’s Effects on Law Enforcement. Global Journal of Forensic Science & Medicine, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.33552/gjfsm.2019.01.000516

Rackstraw, E. (2023). When Reality TV Creates Reality: How “Copaganda” Affects Police, Communities, and Viewers. Harvard University Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4592803

Raspati, P. A., & Setiawati, E. (2021). Pengaruh Program Reality Show Kepolisian terhadap Sikap Penonton di Jakarta. Prosiding Jurnalistik, 7(1), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.29313/.v7i1.27258

Reiner, R. (2013). Who governs? Democracy, plutocracy, science, and prophecy in policing. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 13(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812474282

Rowe, M., Jones, M., Millie, A., & Ralph, L. (2023). Visible policing: uniforms and the (re)construction of police occupational identity. Policing and Society, 33(2), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2096608

Sanders, C. B., & Sheptycki, J. (2017). Policing, crime and ‘big data’; towards a critique of the moral economy of stochastic governance. Crime, Law and Social Change, 68(1–2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9678-7

Schlosser, J. A. (2013). Bourdieu and Foucault: A Conceptual Integration Toward an Empirical Sociology of Prisons. Critical Criminology, 21(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-012-9164-1

Skogan, W. G. (2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society, 16(2), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460600662098

Surette, R. (2015). Performance Crime and Justice. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 27(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2015.12036041

Triola, A. M., & Chanin, J. (2023). Police culture, transparency, and civilian oversight: A case study of the National City Police Department. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 25(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557221132490

Van Brakel, R. (2021). How to Watch the Watchers? Democratic Oversight of Algorithmic Police Surveillance in Belgium. Surveillance and Society, 19(2). https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/index|

Walsh, J. P., Baker, V., & Frade, B. (2022). Policing and social media: The framing of technological use by Canadian newspapers (2005–2020). Criminology and Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221114254

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.