Implementation of the ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons, Particularly Women and Children (ACTIP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v20i1.696Keywords:
trafficking in persons, ACTIP, RSCT, SOMTC, ASEANAbstract
Human trafficking or trafficking in persons is a transnational crime that endangers global and regional security. Countries in the Southeast Asia region serve as origin, transit, and destination for trafficking in persons syndicates. In a unified effort to address this issue, ASEAN adopted the ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (ACTIP) in 2015, serving as a legally binding mechanism for regional cooperation to tackle trafficking in persons. Since its adoption, ACTIP has not been effectively implemented by ASEAN, as it has not reduced the number of TIP cases in the region. The primary mechanism, the ASEAN Senior Officials Meeting on Transnational Crime (SOMTC), solely functions in monitoring, facilitating coordination, evaluating, and compiling periodic reports on the implementation of the convention, lacking the authority to enforce compliance with ACTIP. In addition to the unique principles of the “ASEAN Way”, the challenges encountered by ASEAN in addressing trafficking in persons are notably intricate. To uncover the intricating issues, the author utilizes the Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT) by Barry Buzan and Ole Waever to clarify the variables that hinder the effective implementation of ACTIP in ASEAN. The complexity of addressing trafficking in persons will be analysed at national, international, regional, and global levels using four RSCT variables: boundary, anarchic structures, power distribution, and social construction within the ASEAN organization. This study employs qualitative methodologies utilizing primary and secondary data sources, including scholarly literature, publications, and official reports from ASEAN bodies, government agencies, and international organizations. Given the identified issues, ASEAN must execute internal changes by strengthening the function of the SOMTC to create a cooperative framework at the technical level for the effective implementation of ACTIP.Downloads
References
Afriansyah, R., Febrianti, V., & Sari, I. (2022). Upaya ASEAN dalam menangani human trafficking di regional ASEAN (Studi kasus: Perdagangan perempuan & anak). Aufklarung: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(3), 225.
Apriliani, D. (2020). Keamanan manusia dalam perspektif studi keamanan kritis (Critical Security Studies): Studi kasus peranan APSC dalam pemberantasan human trafficking. 2507(February), 1–9.
Archana Sinha Kotecha. (2018). ASEAN & ACTIP: Using a regional legal framework to fight a global crime. Global Initiative, September, 122–133.
Balitbang Kemenhan. (2025, April 16). Perang dagang AS–Tiongkok: Dampak, peluang, tantangan dan solusi strategis bagi Indonesia. https://www.kemhan.go.id/balitbang/2025/04/16/perang-dagang-as-tiongkok-dampak-peluang-tantangan-dan-solusi-strategis-bagi-indonesia.html
Calcara, G. (2021). Balancing international police cooperation: INTERPOL and the undesirable trade-off between rights of individuals and global security. Liverpool Law Review, 42(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09266-9
Chea, O. (2023). Geopolitical competition among great powers and ASEAN’s policy preference. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 19(20), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n20p52
Danang, M., & Hutama, P. (n.d.). Intervensi negara ketiga dan peran Indonesia bersama ASEAN pada penyelesaian isu Laut Cina Selatan (LCS).
Emmers, R. (2003). ASEAN and the securitization of transnational crime in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review, 16(3), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274032000085653
Gede Sudika Mangku, D. (2014). Meneropong prinsip non-intervensi yang masih melingkar dalam ASEAN (Issue 3).
Hassan, F. (n.d.). Kepentingan negara-negara besar di Asia Tenggara. 25–26.
Ign. L. Adhi Baskara. (2019, January 10). Saat Cina dan Amerika berebut pengaruh di Asia Tenggara. https://tirto.id/saat-cina-dan-amerika-berebut-pengaruh-di-asia-tenggara-ddxg
IOM. (n.d.). ASEAN and trafficking in persons: Using data as a tool. ASEAN-IOM.
Khoo, O. (2010). Regional approaches to trafficking in women in Southeast Asia: The role of national human rights institutions and the new ASEAN human rights body. Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(2), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2010.11910871
Kotecha, A. L. (2017). ASEAN & ACTIP: Using a regional legal framework to fight a global crime. Liberty Asia.
Mangku, D. G. (2018). Peran Badan Nasional Pengelolaan Perbatasan (BNPP) dalam menjaga kedaulatan wilayah NKRI. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial.
Mahendra, Y. I., Ramadhoan, R. I., & Suhermanto, D. F. (2023). Pengaruh kebijakan Belt and Road Initiative Tiongkok terhadap stabilitas sub-kompleks keamanan Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 19(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v19i2.5788.156-174
Nugroho, M. S. (1994). ASEAN and security in Southeast Asia. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/42846
Polri, D. B. (2004). Country report on SOMTC 2024. Jakarta: Polri.
Oktavian, A., Yusro, M. R., Wibisono, T. Y., Alifia, N. A., & Pertiwi, A. P. (2024). ASEAN Ministerial Meeting on Transnational Crime (AMMTC) cooperation in handling transnational crime issues: Case study of human trafficking in Southeast Asia. 2(1), 38–52.
Orang, P., & Perempuan, T. (2020). Laporan Dasar 2020.
Pramanta, R. A., Maziyah, R., Karisma, D., Asri, R., Tiara, A., Bua, K., Priambodo, B., & Mahendra, D. B. (n.d.). Kemitraan strategis non-zero sum game: Hubungan ASEAN-Australia dalam konteks geopolitik.
Pratiwi, H. W. S., & Sukandar, R. (2024). Indonesia’s strategy in ASEAN in handling the issues of human trafficking in Cambodia. Jurnal Mantik, 8(1), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.35335/mantik.v8i1.4895
Publicuho, J., Saputro, B., Ulung, A. K., Abdurrohim, M., Ilmu, S., Internasional, H., Indonesia, S. N., & Selatan, J. (2024b). Kompleks keamanan regional Indo-Pasifik sebagai faktor. 7(4), 2091–2110.
Sadurski, L. (n.d.). Regional security complex theory: Why is this concept still worth developing? Regionalny Kompleks Bezpieczeństwa: Dlaczego warto rozwijać tę koncepcję?, 75(3), 137–153.
Soesilowati, S. (2010). Sovereignty in ASEAN’s regional order-building. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2).
Subono, N. I., Kosandi, M., & Indonesia, U. (2019). The regionalism paradox in the fight against human trafficking: Indonesia and the limits of regional cooperation in ASEAN. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 16(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v16i2.2025
Sundram, P. (2024). ASEAN cooperation to combat transnational crime: Progress, perils, and prospects. Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304828
Solim, J. (2019). The accommodation of ASEAN Convention against Trafficking in Persons (ACTIP) in Indonesia regulation. Fiat Justisia, 13(2).
Subitmele, S. (n.d.). Negara ASEAN yang berbatasan langsung dengan daratan Indonesia adalah? Simak penjelasannya. https://www.liputan6.com/hot/read/5378588/negara-asean-yang-berbatasan-langsung-dengan-daratan-indonesia-adalah-simak-penjelasannya?page=3
Smerchuar, N., & Madhyamapurush, W. (2023). The puzzle of ASEAN instruments to combat human trafficking. WIMAYA, 1(02), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.33005/wimaya.v1i02.40
Waever, B. B. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Tim. (2023, March 17). Letak geografis ASEAN, negara-negara Asia Tenggara. Edukasi. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/edukasi/20230314150612-569-924892/letak-geografis-asean-negara-negara-asia-tenggara
Wirawan, M., & Novikrisna, D. (2024). Legal instrument under the “ASEAN Way”: The case of ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol22.1.1726
Yusran, R. (2018). The ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons: A preliminary assessment. Asian Journal of International Law, 8(1), 258–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251317000108
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
